• 100 W Broadway, Ste 870, Glendale, CA 91210

Practice Areas

Embezzlement & Conversion Defense

Get a Free Consultation

Embezzlement and conversion cases typically arise from allegations that someone improperly used or transferred money or property entrusted to them. These cases often involve business partners, employees, executives, nonprofit officers, fiduciaries, or individuals in positions of financial responsibility.

Many of these matters begin as internal disputes, audits, or employment terminations and later escalate into criminal investigations.

Common Statutes Involved

  • Federal Embezzlement — 18 U.S.C. § 641
  • Allegations involving theft or conversion of government property or funds.
  • Theft or Embezzlement from Employee Benefit Plans — 18 U.S.C. § 664
  • Allegations involving improper handling of pension or benefit plan assets.
  • Bank Embezzlement — 18 U.S.C. § 656
  • Allegations involving misappropriation of bank funds by an officer, director, or employee.
  • Theft from Interstate Shipment or Organization — 18 U.S.C. § 659
  • Allegations involving theft from goods in interstate commerce.
  • Wire Fraud — 18 U.S.C. § 1343
  • Frequently charged when electronic transfers are involved.
  • Mail Fraud — 18 U.S.C. § 1341
  • Used when mailed documents allegedly furthered the conduct.
  • Conspiracy — 18 U.S.C. § 371
  • Often added to broaden the scope of liability.
  • At the state level, conversion or embezzlement allegations may also arise under theft statutes, breach of fiduciary duty claims, or related civil actions.

How These Cases Commonly Arise

Embezzlement cases often turn on authorization and intent, not simply on whether money moved.

Internal audits or accounting discrepancies

Business partnership disputes

Compensation or bonus disagreements

Authorization disputes over use of company funds

Expense reimbursements later questioned

Informal or undocumented financial arrangements

Get a Free Consultation

RICO Integration in Embezzlement Cases

  • In larger investigations, prosecutors may attempt to frame multiple alleged transactions as part of a broader criminal enterprise. Wire fraud, mail fraud, and other theft-related offenses can serve as predicate acts under 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1). By alleging a "pattern" of activity, the government may attempt to:
  • Aggregate separate transactions into one enterprise case
  • Expand liability across business partners or employees
  • Increase sentencing exposure
  • Seek forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 1963
  • RICO allegations significantly elevate both criminal and financial risk beyond the underlying dispute.

Potential Penalties

  • Embezzlement-related offenses carry serious criminal and financial consequences.
  • Imprisonment
  • Federal embezzlement penalties vary by statute (often up to 10 years or more, depending on the amount involved)
  • Bank embezzlement (18 U.S.C. § 656) may carry up to 30 years
  • Fines under 18 U.S.C. § 3571
  • Restitution to alleged victims
  • Forfeiture under applicable federal statutes, including 18 U.S.C. §§ 981, 982, 1963

Sentencing Considerations

  • Loss calculations under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1
  • Enhancements for abuse of trust or fiduciary role
  • Multiple transactions charged separately
  • Allegations of sophisticated means

Before You Respond to Allegations

  • If you are accused of misusing funds or property:
  • Do not attempt to "fix" records or move funds
  • Do not provide informal explanations to investigators without counsel
  • Preserve relevant documents and communications
  • Understand that internal company investigations may later become criminal matters
  • Many embezzlement cases begin as employment or business disputes. Early legal guidance can prevent civil disagreements from escalating into criminal charges.
Request a Confidential Consultation

SAMSON LAW

A Professional Law Corporation

Company

Company

Practice Areas

  • Fluent in English, Armenian, and Russian