Practice Areas

Civil Rights & Law Enforcement Defense

A core component of our litigation practice is defending sheriff’s departments, municipalities, and individual officers in high-exposure civil rights litigation. These cases often involve split-second decisions made under tense and rapidly evolving circumstances. Effective defense requires not only command of constitutional law, but a clear understanding of real-world policing.

Areas of Representation

Civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alleged illegal search and seizure (Fourth Amendment)
False arrest and unlawful detention
Improper investigation claims
Excessive force allegations
High-speed pursuit liability
First Amendment retaliation claims
Selective enforcement or prosecution
Negligent hiring, training, and supervision
Monell claims alleging unconstitutional custom, policy, or practice

Use of Force & Constitutional Standards

In use-of-force cases, courts apply the objective reasonableness standard established in Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989). The analysis requires evaluating force from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, not with hindsight, while accounting for the severity of the crime, the threat posed, and whether the suspect was actively resisting or attempting to flee.

We ground our defense strategy in the governing constitutional standards, including:

Strategic Advocacy

Civil rights defense requires disciplined case development, careful factual framing, and credible courtroom advocacy. We defend our clients firmly and strategically, protecting professional reputations while ensuring that constitutional standards are applied correctly and fairly.

Why Peace Officers Trust Us